There is a maintenance cost of "being understandable to all members" in a community that is not allowed to go through
There is a maintenance cost of "being understandable to all members" in a community that is not allowed to go through
N: Hypothesis: In a community where no through traffic is allowed, there is a maintenance cost of "being understandable to all members".
N: The conversation that took place a year ago was "rehashed" in the wake of this story When this style of communication is happening, the desire for "immediate response" goes down. (or only those who have gone down remain in the community).
T: In an instant, I can say "Oh, I get it" or "I see, I see, I see," or I can just go along with the conversation even if I don't understand the meaning of what is being said.
On the other hand, I understand (or don't understand) I may not be a good communicator./villagepump/基素.icon
N: uke!
T: ↑asynchronous but synchronous-like w
N: If you can't take in the meaning, it must be hard for you to think and look things up slowly, even in synchronous communication. w
With that explanation, it looks like you can only say "I see" without knowing what it means. T: Many people can't make sense of it! That's why we have Japanese as a test subject!
People say, "I see" even if they don't know what it means!
I see!/villagepump/cFQ2f7LRuLYP.icon
N: I see()
T: That's still fine for synchronous communication.
N: The theory that they just assume it's okay because they don't run the checking process to see if it's okay.
T: If the checking process doesn't run, then it's okay at that point, for that person.
N: If you originally intended to have a chat for the purpose of grooming, that's fine. T: It's a great grooming. [It's a good cosmetic action that makes you feel like you're using your head even though it's a meaningless conversation.
---